Machiavelli the Prince Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Machiavelli the Prince - Essay ExampleThe peoples favor plays a boss responsibility in ensuring that princes remain in control of the realm. The kingdom, therefore, offers a lot of challenges to princes in order to quench in power since lack of community hold up leads to kingdom loss to preferred princes (Machiavelli 43). In regard to this problem, Machiavellian has proposed variant ways in which princes and leaders in general should adopt to lollygag in power. The methods presented by the fountain are served to keep citizen support at all times both(prenominal) for the earlier leaders and leaders of today and tomorrow. However, despite the teaching of these methods in education institutions, most of the methods lone(prenominal) apply for the case of the prince. The methods are specifically designed as tools for the princes selfish welfare. In the book, the author presents the question, and responses have been developed to criticize the thinkers position, by means of various accounts presented by comparing it to the spartan approach of elitism. Presented Question The question presented by the thinker does not gyrate about what makes human veracious but rather what makes a compelling prince. The question has been perfectly answered by the writer through the practical application of the thinker ideologies. The ideologies are the methods that the thinker presents to the prince in an attempt to ensure the public remain on his side. The prince through the thinker must come up with stratagem to ensure loyalty from the masses, to keep the large macrocosm on his side. The issue brought about is that the prince has no regard for the human morality rather he cares much about retention of his realm. Critical Response The ideologies presented by Machiavelli can be regarded to be purely scientific. Machiavelli utilizes the sort system in which he treats kingdoms as the different species that have been prearranged into a political nomenclature. Machiavelli also provides worthy historical examples to back up his claims. He exhibits his clear knowledge of past chronological events and develops the whole business relationship through a clear argument. The prince has to uphold influence in his kingdom, and this necessitates the installation of tutelage into the citizens through various strict rules. However, while still maintaining power, the head has to take into thought the implications of the strict measures. The price has to install fear into the populace while still maintaining an unnecessary cruelty since unnecessary cruelty may work against him. The prince has, therefore, to offset between cruelty and installation of fear as well as show respect to his subjects to prevent every unnecessary rivalries. The matter presented through the analysis, brings into light the idea that Machiavelli observes modest value in love, as well as the loyalty, that it might acquire from the populace. Machiavelli has the feeling that rulers have the ob ligation of making their citizens aware of their say-so or powers (Machiavelli 38). The author provides that competent princes have to establish themselves in their individual control of their realm sort of of concentrating on other leaders. The author adds that the princes have to attempt to steer clear of annoyance through any means possible. According to these statements, the author conveys the message that the rulers have to stay compact although they ought not to invite hatred because