Ethical Dilemna – Law Enforcement

Incident Review1. What is the honorable take or problem? Identify the issue succinctly. The ethical issue would be rather to arrest the homosexual for domestic violence or driving while intoxicated due to the exam that the officers performed and what they observed.2. What are the most important facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision presented? Include either important effectiveness economic, social, or political pres indisputables, and exclude inconsequential facts.The most important facts is that the car was dormant warm and they observed the man drop something out of his pockets that looked like keys. The wife stated that she had not driven the vehicle all day and the man stated that he had not driven the car since he arrived 4 hours ago. The officer performed a sobriety test and a preliminary alcoholic drink screening test which revealed that the mans blood alcohol was in two ways the legal limit. There was also a domestic violence vocal which is the reason the officer responded to the house.3. Identify each claimant (key actor) who has an interest in the return of this ethical issue. From the perspective of the clean agentthe individual contemplating an ethical mark of actionwhat obligation is owed to the claimant? Why? Claimant(key actor) Obligation (owed to the claimant) Perspective (What does the claimant hope pass on happen?) Husband Fidelity, beneficence The husband is trying to avoid organism arrested and wishes to be left alone by the officers.Wife Beneficence, non-injury The wife does not privation to her husband to be arrested and does not want the help of the two officers officer Nixon and Officer Nook Justice The officers are there to seek the truth and judge of the crimes that have been committed. Even though the case may be thrown out of court the officers do have the warmth of the car as evidence to present to the court.Society Justice Society wants to make sure that the wife gets help against her husband for domestic violence. Society also wants to make sure that the streets are safe and if the husband is behind the wheel at the range the legal limit of alcohol then he is putting himself and hunting lodge in harm.Evaluating utility(a)s4. What are two selections for the scenario? One substitute can be a wild card that you ordinarily may not visit an option because of potential implications. Both should be within ingenuous go out and control of the same moral agent. alternating(a) AAlternative B5. Respond to the pass offing questions ground on your developed alternatives.Alternative A Alternative B What are the outstrip- and worst-case scenarios if you have this alternative?Will anyone be harmed if this alternative is chosen? If so, how will they be harmed? Consider families and derivative effects.Would honoring an idea or value much(prenominal) as personal, professional, or religiousmake the alternative invalid? atomic number 18 there any rules, laws, or principl es that support the alternative? Are there rules, laws, or principles that make the alternative invalid? State the rule or principle and indicate if it invalidates or supports the alternative.Applying Ethical Guidelines6. Consider each ethical guideline and explain whether it would support or reject your alternative. Guidelines based on the action itself Alternative A Alternative B Should this alternative obtain a rule or policy that everyone in this situation should follow in similar situations in the future? (Kant)Does this alternative result in using any person as a means to an shutdown without consideration for his or her basic integrity? (Kant)Is the intent of this action free from vested interest or ulterior motive? (Kants good will)Does this alternative demonstrate a genuine concern for others affected by the decision, and is the moral agency responding to a perceived need?Guidelines based on consequences Alternative A Alternative B Is the good that results from this altern ative outweighed by the potential harm that might be done to others? (Mills harm principle)Is any harm brought about by anyone other than the moral agent? (causal harm)Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenseless? (paternalism)To what degree is this alternative based on the moral agents own best interest? (ethical egoism)Which alternative will generate the greatest benefitor the least amount of harmfor the greatest number of people? assume only one alternative. (utilitarianism)Ethical Decision Making7. Choose to proceed with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explain the reasons for your decision.