Have Technology Taken over Some People Lives Essay

Is in that respect a concern about people becoming likewise dependent on technology? Do you view too much technology is too much for your children? Does technology proceed the brain? Some of us think that there is a possibility that too much technology is affect our children. They seem to not get the concept of things. Kids today cant seem to think in a rational way. Everything take for grantede for children is by means of some type of technology. Technology is taught at such a unsalted age that kids dont get the opportunity to learn on their own and by the time they arrive teenage it seems to become more evident.Sarah Harris in a MailOne article Too much net income using up can damage teenagers brains says, Excessive lucre use may behave parts of teenagers brains to waste away, a study reveals. Scientists discovered signs of atrophy of hoary liaison in the brains of heavy meshwork users that grew worse over time. This could affect their concentration and memory, as well as their ability to make decisions and repair goals. It could also reduce their inhibitions and lead to inappropriate behavior. Researchers took MRI brain scans from 18 university students, aged 19, who spent eight to 13 hours a day acting games online, six days a week.The students were classified as internet addicts by and by answering eight questions, including whether they had tried to give up using computers and whether they had be to family members about the amount of time they spent online. compared them with a control root of 18 students who spent fewer than both hours a day on the internet. One set of MRI images focuse on white-haired(a) matter at the brains wrinkled surface, or cortex, where the processing of memory, emotions, speech, sight, hearing and motor control occurs.Comparing grey matter between the two groups revealed atrophy within several small regions of all the online addicts brains. The scans showed that the hugeer their internet addiction contin ued, the more serious the damage was. The researchers also found changes in deep-brain tissue chew the fated white matter, through which messages pass between different areas of grey matter in the nervous system. These structural abnormalities were probably associated with functional impairments in cognitive control, they say. The researchers added that these abnormalities could have made the teenagers more easily internet dependent, but concluded they were the consequence of IAD (internet addiction disorder).Our results suggested long-term internet addiction would result in brain structural alterations, they said. The study, published in the PLoS ONE journal, was carried out by neuroscientists and radiologists at universities and hospitals in China, where 24million youths are estimated to be addicted to the internet. Wake-up call Dr Aric Sigman said it was a shame that we needed photos of brains to empathize that sitting in front of a screen is not acceptable for childrens healt h In Britain, children spend an average of five hours and 20 minutes a day in front of TV or computer screens, according to estimates by the market-research agency Childwise. Dr Aric Sigman, a fellow of the purplish Society of Medicine, described the Chinese research as a wake-up call.He said It strikes me as a terrible shame that our indian lodge requires photos of brains shrinking in order to take seriously the common-sense assumption that long hours in front of screens is not good for our childrens health. Baroness Greenfield, professor of materia medica at Oxford University, described the results as very striking. She said It shows theres a very clear relationship between the figure of years these young people have been addicted to the internet and changes in their brains. We need to do more experiments and we need to invest more coin in research and have more studies like this.The neuroscientist has previously warned there could be a link between childrens poor maintenan ce spans and the use of computers and social-networking websites. She is concerned that not enough attention is being remunerative to evidence that computer use is changing young peoples brains. Professor Karl Friston, a neuroscientist at University College London, told the Scientific American journal the techniques used in the small-scale study were rigorous. He said It goes against intuition, but you dont need a large sample size. That the results show anything meaningful at all is very telling.